
The National Board For Arabic and Islamic Studies (NBAIS), Recognized in the year 2011bu the National Council on Education and assigned a supervisory role over Research and Development (NERDC) in 2013 has come under intense criticisms and different shades of accusations, from the feeble to the unfounded, overtime by various commentators in the country.
However, thoughtful observation prudence point strongly to the complicity of it’s rival body in the whole treacherous saga and/or machinations. Put starkly, the National Examination Council (NECO) seems to be the biggest, if ever there another force throwing it’s weight behind these evil attempts to condemn the innocent board to the dustbin of history.
If anybody were in doubt, NECO has cleared such with an open letter addressed to the Honorable Minister of Education and dated 13th September, 2022 where in it came up with some frivolous arguments.
The letter NECO stated, was sequel to an invitation to present comments on a bill captioned thus;
A BILL FOR AN ACT TO PROVIDE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL BOARD FOR ARABIC AND ISLAMIC STUDIES TO HAVE RESPONSIBILITY AND ITS DUE ADMINISTRATION, AND FOR RELATED MATTERS (HB. 1728).
NECO thus tried to specify the mandatory functions or powers of the NBAIS and made what it deemed a good case for the dispensability of the board.
It will interest you to have a perusal of it’s three feeble arguments, which are as follows, according to the council;
(i) The eligibility to present certificates at the Higher Education Level should be limited to disciplines strictly related to Arabic and Islamic studies, such that the certificates offered to candidates do not contain conventional subjects as in the case of either NECO, WAEC and NBTEB.
(ii) No mention of the word ‘Examination’ in the name of the board in the proposed Act. This make the name not being explieit but incomplete, and hence sounds very ambiguous if it is an Examination body.
(iii) There is the possibility of not having a national outlook as an Examination body since it may not capture some states or geopolitical zones where Arabic and Islamic studies are not sufficiently studied.
After enumerating it’s stipulated functions, NECO ended the letter with a prayer this; We plead with the Federal government to avoid duplication of functions of the existing examination bodies by clearly demarcating the functions of NECO as presented above, in order to avoid proliferation of examination bodies in Nigeria.
To say the least however, the council has based it’s three lines of arguments Ina very week and wobbly foundation as for the first, by implication from the foregoing, NECO wants to argue that the body in question crosses its stated boundary when its covered subjects include conventional ones outside those under Arabic and lslamic studies.
But this is a gross error miscalculation that shouldn’t have emanated from the protesting body.
For instance, among the stipulated functions of NBAIS are “creating an avenue for collaboration with relevant agencies in the process of designing a suitable integrated curriculum that encorporates both Western and Islamic systems of education” and ” supervision of all Arabic and Islamic schools for purpose of ensuring effective implementation of the integrated curriculum in those schools”.
The point missed by NECO her is that where interdisciplinary integration is concerned, there is every need for NBAIS to entertain both its peculiar and conventional subjects formerly outside its purview for the such integration to take place in other words, if NBAIS is meant to play the role of “integrating Western and Islamic studies” and ‘supervise the effective implementation of such integration`, it must treat both Islamic and conventional subjects.
For the second point, where the absence of the word’examination’ in NBAIS becomes NECO’s strategic weapon, one finds the body’s argument reduced here to dramatic circumstances.
How could NECO forget and ignore similar cases in the names or acronyms of say national Board for teachnical Education (NABTEB) and the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB)? why hasn’t such problem stopped these from being incomplete and ambiguous as NECO alleges on NBAIS?
Thirdly, the claims that there is possibility of not having a national outlook because some states where Arabic and lslamic studies not sufficiently conducted may not be covered is as fallacious as the other arguments.
The nationality of its outlook is already established by state powers and official approval, which cover every state, those ready at present and those coming up to join in the beta future.
Finally, NECO’s blunderous conclusion and plea against duplication of functions by existing bodies is off the mark given the stark disparity between the councils assigned roles as outlined in its written letter to the Minister of Education and those of NBAIS.
For example, NECO claims to among other things revise public interest in examinations for admission into federal colleges and allied institutions; collect and disseminate information on matters relating to such admission; conduct and control national common entrance examination; conduct aptitude test for candidates; monitor and keep records of continuous assessment; control conduct of internal and external senior secondary School certificate examination; conduct standard national assessment of education performance and report such standards and related matters to the minister from time to time.
These contrast sharply with the integratory roles of NBAIS; its collaboration with states and relevant agencies on special programmes; mainstreaming of Madarasa and Tsangaya curricular; conduct of of final examination for Arabic and lslamic school and ensuring compliance throughout with the provision of the National policy on Education (NPE).
In fact, if any examination body is to be disearded , given its recurring cases of rampant malpractices every year, it is the National Examination Council, NECO, whose notoriety has since pushed many commentators to demand its total dissolution.
But NBAIS is a clean body as for as its establishment, operational activities and objectives are concerned; therefore, let us not deny the large population its beneficial role and the future generation its huge potential simply out calculated prujudice or hidden rivalry and ideological differences.
COMRADE MOHAMMED MUSA MOHAMMED
EDUCATIONAL WRITER AND ANALYST
musamohdeen@gmail.com








































